CITY OF LADUE V. HORN
720 S.W. 2d 745 (1986)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over a zoning ordinance that defined family as
'blood, marriage, or adoption.'
FACTS: Certain zones in Ladue (P) were designated as one family residential. This was
detailed in an ordinance for which the stated purpose was health, safety, morals and general
welfare. Ds purchased a home located in the single family residential zone of P. Ds were not
married and between them had three children of which two attended universities and were not
home most of the time. P made demands on D to vacate the household, as they did not
compromise a family. Ds refused to vacate and P sued to enjoin Ds. The trial court entered a
permanent injunction in favor of P and Ds appealed. Ds contended that the ordinance violated
free association and privacy.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment