HERZFELD V. HERZFELD
781 So.2d 1070 (2001)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Herzfeld (S), adopted son brought suit against Herzfeld (F), adoptive
father for assault and battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional
distress, and negligence because of sexual abuse. S appealed a dismissal of the claims. The
District Court of Appeal, Third District (Dade County) Florida reversed the judgment and
certified the case for appeal to the Florida Supreme Court.
FACTS: S was placed in F's care as a foster child in 1988. F adopted S three years later
when S was sixteen years old. On June 5, 1997, S filed a four count civil complaint against
F, alleging repeated sexual abuse. The trial court granted F's motion to dismiss counts I
through III on the ground that intentional tort claims are barred by the parental immunity
doctrine. After finding that F's insurance policy [did] not cover S's negligence claim, the
trial court also found the parental immunity doctrine applicable to count IV and granted F's
motion for summary judgment on that count. The Third District reversed and held that because
family harmony is already destroyed in sexual abuse cases, 'the parental immunity doctrine
does not bar the action by the minor child against his parent for damages arising from
sexual abuse.' The case was eventually certified to the Florida Supreme Court.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment