JUSTICES OF APPELLATE DIVISION V. ERDMANN
301 N.E.2d 426 (1973)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was apparently an appeal from the discipline of an attorney for
bad mouthing the court.
FACTS: D was found guilty of professional misconduct and censured. The charge was based
on an article which appeared in Life Magazine by D that criticized the judges and said
'They're whores who have become madams...I would like to be a judge...but I don't know the
going price.' This appeal resulted.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment