LORD PORTARLINGTON V. SOULBY
40 ENG.REP. 40 (1834)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a motion to dissolve an injunction that restrained Ds from
suing in Ireland upon a bill of exchange.
FACTS: A bill was given by Lord Portarlington for money lost at play. An illegal
consideration was given for the note and eventually an injunction was granted that
restrained Ds from suing in Ireland upon the Bill of Exchange. The bill was written such
that it was accepted by P payable to a person by the name of Aldridge by whom it was
endorsed and passed to Mr. Brook, a dealer in wines and then by him to Ds. Ds wanted to
collect on the bill but were prohibited from such collection, as the consideration for it
was illegal. Ds were then enjoined by the court from suing in Ireland to collect the monies.
They then motioned to dissolve the injunction.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment