RAPPAPORT V KATZ
380 F. Supp. 808 (1974)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a motion for summary judgment based on dress code
requirements.
FACTS: Ps were upset that they were subjected to dress guidelines promulgated by the City
Clerk for wedding ceremonies performed at City Hall, including the exchange of a ring or
rings. Ps claimed that these processes deprived them of due process of law in violation of
their constitutional rights. The rules required that the bride must wear a dress skirt and
blouse-no slacks- and the groom must wear a coat and tie and that one or two rings must be
exchanged. The ring requirement was satisfied by the exchange of any other tangible item.
Rappaport (P) wanted to wear pants at her wedding but was told to wear a skirt.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment