STUART V. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ELECTIONS 295 A.2d 223 (1972) CASE BRIEF

STUART V. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ELECTIONS
295 A.2d 223 (1972)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over voter registration.
FACTS: Stuart (P) was married to Austell and wanted to register to vote in Maryland. P disclosed to the registrar of voters that she was married but used her maiden name consistently and nonfraudulently. P was informed by the Board of Supervisors of Elections (D) that because she was a woman and married under Maryland law, her legal surname became her husband's upon marriage. P was told to complete a change of name form or her registration would be cancelled. P's registration was cancelled. P sued D. The court ruled that P was entitled to use her name but that she had to file the name change form in order to be registered under her maiden name. P appealed.

ISSUE:


RULE OF LAW:


HOLDING AND DECISION:


LEGAL ANALYSIS:





Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com




© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner

No comments:

Post a Comment