STUART V. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ELECTIONS
295 A.2d 223 (1972)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over voter registration.
FACTS: Stuart (P) was married to Austell and wanted to register to vote in Maryland. P
disclosed to the registrar of voters that she was married but used her maiden name
consistently and nonfraudulently. P was informed by the Board of Supervisors of Elections
(D) that because she was a woman and married under Maryland law, her legal surname became
her husband's upon marriage. P was told to complete a change of name form or her
registration would be cancelled. P's registration was cancelled. P sued D. The court ruled
that P was entitled to use her name but that she had to file the name change form in order
to be registered under her maiden name. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment