TAPIA V. SUPERIOR COURT
53 Cal.3d 282 (1991)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the implementation of Prop 115 in California.
FACTS: Tapia (D) was accused of committing first degree murder no February 12, 1989.
Prop. 115 took effect on June 6, 1990. Voir dire had not been started on D's prosecution by
that date but the trial judge ruled that he could do the voir dire as mandated under Prop.
115. D objected and petitioned the Court of Appeal for a writ of mandate. That relief was
denied. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment