UNITED STATES V. ABEL
469 U.S. 45 (1984)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal for a conviction for robbery.
FACTS: Abel (D) was on trial for robbery. D and two cohorts were indicated for bank
robbery. The other parties pleaded guilty but D went to trial. Ehle, agreed to testify
against D. D informed the District Court that he would seek impeach Ehle's testimony with
that of one Mills, who would testify that after the robbery Ehle had admitted to Mills that
Ehle intended to implicate D falsely, in order to receive favorable treatment from the
Government. The prosecutor then disclosed that he intended to discredit Mills' testimony by
calling Ehle back to the stand to testify that respondent, Mills, and Ehle were all members
of a secret prison gang that was sworn to perjury and self-protection on each member's
behalf. Mills denied knowledge of the prison gang, and the Court allowed P to recall Ehle,
who testified that he, D, and Mills were members of the prison gang and described the gang
and its tenets. The jury convicted D. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that Ehle's
rebuttal testimony was admitted not just to show that respondent's and Mills' membership in
the prison gang might cause Mills to color his testimony but also to show that because Mills
belonged to the gang he must be lying on the stand. The court further held that Ehle's
testimony implicated respondent as a member of the gang, but that since respondent did not
take the stand, the testimony could not have been offered to impeach him and prejudiced him
'by mere association.' The Government (P) appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment