BANK OF LYONS V. SCHULTZ
399 N.E.2d 1286 (1980)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Schultz (P) sued Bank (D) for malicious prosecution for damages
allegedly sustained as a result of two actions that the bank filed against her, which were
decided in her favor. The trial court dismissed her complaint. The Appellate Court reversed.
D appealed.
FACTS: D filed a creditor's suit against P and her late husband, who died during the
pendency of that suit. As the beneficiary of his life insurance policies P was to receive
$61,533.27. D filed for an injunction to restrain distribution of the insurance proceeds to
P. The trial court issued a preliminary injunction enjoining the insurance companies from
making payments to P and ordering that the funds be deposited with the clerk of the circuit
court. That injunction was dissolved and D's complaint was dismissed. P was also granted
leave to file a suggestion of her damages on account of the injunction's issuance. P was
awarded $2,369.67 on her suggestion of damages to cover interest she would have earned on
the insurance proceeds held by the clerk of the court, attorneys' fees and costs. Seventeen
days after the injunction was dissolved, D was given leave to amend the complaint in its
pending creditor's suit by adding a second count, and in it D again prayed for an accounting
and for a preliminary injunction prohibiting distribution of the insurance proceeds. A
preliminary injunction was entered on July 19, but almost two years later, on September 24,
1965, the court dismissed the second count, stating that the injunction had been wrongfully
issued. The court also dissolved this injunction and ordered the clerk of the court to
release to the plaintiff those insurance proceeds in excess of $30,000. P again was given
leave to file a suggestion of damages under section 12. In November of 1965 D, with leave of
court, filed another count to its creditor's suit. This third count alleged conversion and
unlawful withholding of funds based on claims that D had been induced to issue cashier's
checks to Alvin Schultz without consideration and that the bank had erroneously credited P's
account in the amount of $10,200. A master in chancery found, however, that D failed to
prove a prima facie cause of action, and the circuit court, following the recommendation of
the master, dismissed this third count. This was in September 1969. The court ordered the
release of the balance of the insurance proceeds to P. D appealed, and the appellate court
remanded to the trial court to determine whether the P was a holder in due course. The court
found that P was a holder in due course and again dismissed the third count. On June 21,
1972, the trial court dismissed count I of D's creditor's suit because of a failure to
allege fraud. No appeal was taken by D. On August 1, 1972, the plaintiff filed her second
suggestion of damages pursuant to the September 1965 order and, on March 6, 1973, was
awarded a total of $24,103.52, representing unearned interest on the proceeds of insurance,
attorneys' fees and costs. D appealed and the appellate court affirmed. P then sued for
malicious prosecution claiming $49,848.13 in compensatory damages for the forfeiture of her
interest in a house which interest was foreclosed, she alleged, as a result of the
injunction which prevented her from using the insurance proceeds to make mortgage payments.
P also claimed $300,000 in punitive damages. This action was dismissed in that recovery was
barred under the doctrine of res judicata, and, further, because she failed to allege an
arrest of her person, seizure of property, or some other special injury. The appellate court
reversed: the wrongful issuance of the preliminary injunction constituted a seizure of
property for purposes of establishing a cause of action for malicious prosecution and that
P's claim for compensatory and punitive damages was not barred by the doctrine of res
judicata. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment