CREEL V. CRIM 812 So.2d 1259 (2001) CASE BRIEF

CREEL V. CRIM

812 So.2d 1259 (2001)

NATURE OF THE CASE: Creel (D) appealed a judgment in favor of Crim (P) in his action against D, alleging that D trespassed upon his property and had cut and carried away trees from the property.

FACTS: P sued Lovelady and D, alleging that Ds had trespassed upon his property and had cut and carried away trees from the property. D filed a cross-claim against Lovelady for indemnification claiming that Lovelady had directed him to cut timber on her property but that she had instructed him to cut trees that were not on her property. The trial court gave the judgment to P. It also gave D indemnification against Lovelady for 1/2 the damages. D appealed.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner