ERMERT V. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY
559 So. 2d 467 (1990)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Hartford (D) appealed from a judgment that held that the hunting
associates were vicariously liable as members of an unincorporated association for Ermert's
(P) foot injuries sustained in an accidental shooting. Ermert (P) appealed the part of the
judgment that found Employer (D) was not liable.
FACTS: Ermert (P) was accidentally shot in the foot by Decareaux (D) while a guest at a
hunting camp. Besides being a member of the hunting group, Decareaux (D) was president of
and majority stockholder in Nu-Arrow Fence Company (D). Decareaux (D) was expected to seize
any opportunity to further company business regardless of time and place. Decareaux (D) used
the hunting camp to entertain his employees and to promote his business. He invited all of
the Nu-Arrow (D) employees to the camp either at the same time or a few at a time. Decareaux
(D) paid for their expenses out of the petty cash fund. Decareaux (D) also took advantage of
the camp to develop customers and make sales. He had sold fences to the majority of his
fellow hunters, and he derived other business through references given by the regular
members of the hunting group. He invited people who had purchased fences to the camp, and
these customers also referred business. Nu-Arrow (D) derived economic benefit and provided
economic assistance to the hunting camp. P was spending the weekend as a guest of Russell
Larrieu at the hunting camp. P, Larrieu, Brumfield, Caillouette, Bourcq and Decareaux (D)
were at the hunting camp to build duck blinds for the upcoming duck season. As the members
of the group were awakening on Sunday morning, someone told Decareaux (D) that there was a
nutria swimming across the canal. Decareaux (D) picked up a shotgun and some shells. In
violation of the general agreement among the group, he began loading the shells into the
shotgun as he was walking in the camphouse. The gun accidentally fired and struck P's foot,
severely injuring it. He was rushed to a hospital, where several surgeries were performed. P
is permanently disabled. P sued Decareaux (D), Nu-Arrow (D), and their insurers. P also
alleged that Decareaux (D), Larrieu, Caillouette, Bourcq, Cummings and Brumfield and their
respective insurers should be held jointly and solidarily liable because of their alleged
joint venture or partnership relationship. P claimed that the hunting camp was owned by an
unincorporated association composed of the six hunters in the group. The trial court granted
a motion for summary judgment and maintained exceptions of no cause of action in favor of
the hunting group defendants. P appealed and the court reversed holding that the evidence
showed that there was a 'club.' A trial was held and the judge found the group was not a
partnership and then concluded that there was no vicarious liability arising solely out of
membership in such an organization. He applied 'general agency principles' and concluded
that the club members were not vicariously liable for Decareaux's (D) tort because his
actions were in direct contravention of the group's established policy. The trial court also
held that Nu-Arrow (D) benefited from the camp's existence and was therefore liable for
Decareaux's (D) negligence while working at the camp, because Decareaux (D) was within the
scope of his employment at the time of the accident. The court entered judgment against
Decareaux (D) and Nu-Arrow (D) for damages in the amount of $595,000. Ds appealed. The court
held that the members of the hunting group were liable for the damages, with the exception
of Cummings, who was not present at the time of the accident. The court of appeal disagreed
with the trial court's finding that Decareaux (D) was within the scope of his employment at
the time of the accident. It concluded that on the weekend of the accident Decareaux was
engaged in a purely personal recreational pursuit. Everyone appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment