FARWELL V. KEATON
396 Mich. 281, 240 N.W. 2d 217 (1976)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Farwell (P) appealed a ruling in a wrongful death action for
negligence which held that Siegrist did not assume a duty to aid his companion, and neither
knew nor should have known of the need for medical treatment.
FACTS: Farwell (P) and Siegrist consumed some beer at a trailer rental lot. After
attempting to engage in some conversation with some females passing by, they left and
followed the girls to a drive-in restaurant down the street. The girls complained to some
friends and six boys chased P and Siegrist back to the lot. Siegrist escaped, but P was
severely beaten. Siegrist found P under his car in the lot, and applied ice to his head.
Siegrist then drove P around for about two hours, stopping at various drive-ins. P fell
asleep in the back of his car. Around midnight, Siegrist parked P's car in the driveway of
P's grandparent's house, attempted to rouse P, then left. P's grandparents found P the next
morning and took him to the hospital where he died three days later. The jury returned a
verdict for P for $15,000 in damages. The Court of Appeals reversed; Siegrist had not
assumed the duty of obtaining aid for P and that he neither knew nor should have known of
the need for medical treatment. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment