ROBB V. PENNSYLVANIA R.R. CO.
210 A.2d 709 (1965)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Robb (P) appealed a dismissal of her action against R.R. (D) to
recover for the physical consequences of fright caused by the railroad's negligence.
FACTS: D had a right-of-way leased from P. It intersected a private lane leading to P's
house. P was driving an automobile up the lane toward her home when the vehicle stalled at
the railroad grade crossing. A rut about a foot deep had been negligently permitted by D to
form at the crossing. P's rear wheels lodged in the rut and P was unable to get out. P saw
D's train bearing down upon her. With only seconds to spare, she jumped from the stalled
vehicle and fled for her life. Immediately thereafter, the locomotive collided with the
vehicle, hurled it into the air and demolished it. P was standing within a few feet of the
track when the collision occurred and her face was covered with train soot and dirt. There
was no bodily impact; and she suffered no contemporaneous physical injury. P was scared
stiff and emotionally disturbed by the accident. The fright and nervous shock resulted in
physical injuries including cessation of lactation which interfered with P's ability to
nurse and otherwise care for her infant child. Her nervous and general physical condition
resulting from the accident also obliged the plaintiff to abandon a horse breeding business
and an article which she had been engaged to write for substantial compensation. D moved for
summary judgment alleging the impact rule. The trial judge agreed and granted summary
judgment. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment