SINDORF V. JACRON SALES CO., INC.
27 Md. App. 53 (1975)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Sinford (P) appealed a judgment of the Circuit Court for Prince
George's County (Maryland) entering a directed verdict in favor of Jacron (D) in P's
defamation action.
FACTS: Sindorf (P) instituted an action for the tort of slander, demanding judgment
against Jacron (D) and Fridkis (D1), in the amount of $150,000 compensatory damages and
$150,000 punitive damages. P was employed by D for 18 months as a salesman. He resigned on
23 July 1973 because of a dispute over certain sales made by him and commissions he believed
due him. P claimed that he would not receive his commissions from credit sales until payment
had been received for the goods and that uncollectable debts were shared 50/50 by himself
and the corporation. P claimed that he had not been paid his commissions from his charge
sales because the corporation said the accounts were not collected. These disagreements
culminated in P's resignation by letter wherein he explained that he was retaining the
inventory in his possession 'as partial payment of the commissions due me . . . .' D
initiated criminal proceedings against P because of his retention of the goods. The
disposition of those proceedings is not apparent. P was hired by the Tool Box Corporation of
Maryland upon an interview with William Brose, president of that company. D1 then called
Tool Box to ascertain whether P had been working for Tool Box at the same time he had been
working for D. D1 stated to the secretary who answered the phones that he thought P was a
thief. Eventually D1 talked with P's new boss. D1 informed Tool Box that it had better watch
its stock really carefully and that quite a bit of merchandise was not accounted for by P
when he left. D1 also stated that Tool Box should watch P carefully. P's boss told P about
the conversation and P sued in defamation. D claimed privilege; D was given a directed
verdict on privilege. P appealed; the privilege, if it had existed, was lost because of D's
malice and total disregard of the truth.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment