STATES V. LOURDES HOSPITAL 792 N.E.2d 151 (2003) CASE BRIEF

STATES V. LOURDES HOSPITAL

792 N.E.2d 151 (2003)

NATURE OF THE CASE: States (P) sued Hospital (Ds), an anesthesiologist and his practice group, for medical malpractice, alleging that they injured her right arm during her operation to remove an ovarian cyst. Ds moved for summary judgment. P opposed the motion, relying on expert testimony to establish res ipsa loquitur. The trial court denied the motion, but the Appellate Division (New York) reversed that decision. P appealed.

FACTS: P underwent surgery at D for removal of an ovarian cyst. The cyst was successfully removed. P's right arm was placed on a board, extended outward from her body and rotated. An IV tube was then inserted into her right hand in order to administer anesthesia. P complained of pain and a burning sensation when the tube was inserted. When P awoke, she complained of increasing pain in her right arm and shoulder. P has been diagnosed with right thoracic outlet syndrome and reflex sympathetic dystrophy. The cause of the injury is in dispute; however, P alleges negligence in the positioning of her arm during surgery. Specifically, plaintiff believes her arm was negligently hyperabducted beyond a 90-degree angle for an extended period of time. D moved for summary judgment on the ground that there was no direct evidence that Ps arm was hyperabducted during surgery and no evidence of any other negligence. Conceding the absence of direct evidence of negligence, P opposed the motion, submitting expert medical opinion that her injuries would not have occurred in the absence of negligence. P claimed this testimony could be used by a jury in support of a res ipsa loquitur theory. The Supreme Court denied the motion. The Appellate Division reversed, holding that the inference was not permitted since P's injury was not the sort as to which a jury could draw upon its common knowledge and experience to conclude that it would not have occurred in the absence of negligence. P appealed.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner