WILLIAMS V. RANK & SON BUICK, INC.
Sup. Ct. of Wis., 44 Wis.2d 239, 170 NW.2d 807 (1969).
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court in which the
court found judgment in favor of Willams (P) and that Rank (D) had made misrepresentations
to P, which P relied upon.
FACTS: Williams (P) bought a car from Rank & Son Buick, Inc. (D). The salesman told P
that the car was air-conditioned. P took the car for an hour and a half test drive. Several
days after the purchase P discovered that the car was not air-conditioned. P sued D for
fraud. P testified that he relied on an advertisement and the salesman's representations
that the car was air-conditioned. It was shown that the advertisement was first published
two days after P bought the car. P was given a judgment and D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment