THE KING V. PEAR
168 Eng.Rep. 208 (1779).
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal of a larceny conviction.
FACTS: Pear (D) rented a horse from Finch stating his intention to make a journey to another town and return that night. D sold the horse the same day and never returned. D was indicted for larceny. The jury found that D had intended to sell the horse from the start and D was convicted of larceny. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND
DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
No comments:
Post a Comment