MALCHOSE v. KALFELL
664 N.W.2d 508 (2003)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Kalfells (Ds) appealed from the trial court's judgment finding them
liable in a negligence action arising out of an automobile accident.
FACTS: Kalfell (D) and Malchose (P) were involved in a motor vehicle accident. D was
driving a 1992 Pontiac Bonneville titled in the names of his parents. P sued Ss seeking to
recover damages against D for negligence, and against Lance and Lisa Kalfell, the parents,
on theories of family car doctrine, negligent entrustment, and strict liability. The trial
court found D at fault for negligence, the parents liable under both the family car doctrine
and strict liability claims, and it awarded P damages. Ds appeal. D was an adult child
living away from home, D was the owner of the vehicle involved in the accident, and the car
was not being used for family business.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment