SMALICH v. WESTFALL Sup. Ct. of Pa., 440 Pa. 409, 269 A.2d 476 (1970). CASE BRIEF

SMALICH V. WESTFALL

Sup. Ct. of Pa., 440 Pa. 409, 269 A.2d 476 (1970)

NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal from Court of Common Pleas, which granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial for Westfall (D) in Smalich's (P) actions to recover damages on behalf of his son and wife, and on his own behalf as guardian, after an automobile accident involving D.

FACTS: Two automobiles collided in Westmoreland County. One of the vehicles, owned by P, was operated by D. P and her minor son, Michael, were passengers in this automobile at the time. The other vehicle involved was operated by Stephanna Louise Blank (D1). P suffered injuries in the collision which caused her death. Michael Smalich was injured, but recovered. An action in trespass was later instituted, naming both D and D1 as defendants. The estate of P sought damages in both a wrongful death action and a survival action. The jury returned a verdict in favor of all Ps and against both D. Damages were awarded in the wrongful death action in the sum of $1025; in the survival action in the sum of $2000; in the guardian's action in the sum of $166.50; and in the minor's action in the sum of $20,000. Post-trial motions were timely filed by D1, seeking judgment notwithstanding the verdict in the actions on behalf of the P Estate and a new trial in the actions on behalf of the minor and the guardian. Both motions were granted by the court en banc below. The court en banc ruled that, under the facts, the contributory negligence of D must be imputed to the owner of the automobile as a matter of law, and this precluded recovery by P's Estate against D1. Ps appealed.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner