YONATY V. MINCOLLA
945 N.Y.S.2d 774 (2012)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Yonaty (P) and Mincolla (D) appealed an order that denied motions for
summary judgment in P's per se slander action and the first friend's third-party complaint.
FACTS: A nonparty allegedly told D that P was gay or bisexual. D relayed that information
to third-party defendant, a close family friend of P's long-time girlfriend, with the hope
that the girlfriend would be told. P maintains that D's actions caused the deterioration and
ultimate termination of his relationship with his girlfriend. P sued D alleging slander,
intentional infliction of emotional distress and prima facie tort. D commenced the
third-party action, seeking indemnification based upon the republication of the statements.
The court denied third-party defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the
third-party complaint, and partially granted D's motion for summary judgment by dismissing
P's claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and prima facie tort. The court
denied D's motion insofar as she sought dismissal of P's slander claim. The court concluded
that it was bound to follow prior appellate case law holding that statements falsely
imputing homosexuality constitute defamation per se and, thus, P's slander claim need not be
dismissed despite his failure to allege special damages. Everybody appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment