HOFFMAN V. JONES
280 So. 2d 431 (1973)
NATURE OF THE CASE: A certified question was submitted to the court: 'Whether or not the
court should replace the contributory negligence rule with the principles of comparative
negligence?'
FACTS: No real facts were given other than both the plaintiff and the defendant were both
negligent and the court applied contributory negligence but it was overturned by the appeals
court.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
