If you want a trite 20 second explanation about the law, and most law students do, do not read anything we publish. If you want to learn the law and be an exceptional attorney, welcome aboard.
KIEFER V. FRED HOWE MOTORS, INC. 39 Wis.2d 20, 158 N.W.2d 288 (1968) CASE BRIEF
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
KIEFER V. FRED HOWE MOTORS, INC. 39 Wis.2d 20, 158 N.W.2d 288 (1968). CASE BRIEF
KIEFER V. FRED HOWE MOTORS, INC.
39 Wis.2d 20, 158 N.W.2d 288 (1968)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Fred Howe (D) appealed a decision on the issues of whether Kiefer (P), emancipated minor, was legally responsible for his contract with D, whether that contract was disaffirmed, and whether P was liable for misrepresentation.
FACTS: Kiefer (P), a 20-year-old married man with a child, bought a used car from Fred Howe Motors (D). The contract that P signed stated; 'I represent that I am 21 years of age or over.' P became dissatisfied with the car after engine trouble. P claimed the engine block was cracked. D refused to take the car back. After P turned 21 he tried to return the car. It was refused. P sued for rescission. The trial court determined that P was a minor when the contract was made and he was entitled to disaffirm that contract. The court ordered rescission. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND
DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com