BRUNE V. BELINKOFF, 354 Mass. 102, 235 N.E.2d 793 (1968) CASE BRIEF

BRUNE V. BELINKOFF.
354 Mass. 102, 235 N.E.2d 793 (1968)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This is an action of tort for malpractice.
FACTS: Brune (P) had a child under the care of Belinkoff (D). During childbirth, D gave P an 8mg dosage of pontocaine. Eleven hours later, P tried to get out of bed. P slipped and fell, suffering serious injuries. P sued for malpractice, claiming D should have only have given her 5mg of pontocaine. D claimed that the difference in dosage compared with other places, such as New York and Boston, was because they use different obstetrical procedures in New Bedford. The dosage administered by D was the amount customary in New Bedford. The trial court ruled for D. P excepted to her jury instruction not being entered and for one of the D's instructions.

ISSUE:


RULE OF LAW:


HOLDING AND DECISION:


LEGAL ANALYSIS:





Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com




© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner

No comments:

Post a Comment