HALL V. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO., INC.
345 F. Supp. 353 (1972)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Hall (Ps) brought two suits against Du Pont (Ds) from numerous
separate incidents when children were injured by blasting caps: Ps allege that the failure
to warn created an unreasonable risk of harm.
FACTS: A number of children were injured in various states from blasting caps. Ps are
claiming damages against six manufacturers of blasting caps and the I.M.E. on ground of
negligence and conspiracy. Each plaintiff came into possession of blasting caps that were
not marked and which could easily be detonated by a child. Ps alleged that each cap in
question was designed and manufactured jointly or severally by the six Ds or by other
unnamed manufacturers, and by their trade association, the I.M.E. Ds moved to dismiss.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment