HENNEFORD V. SILAS MASON CO., INC.
300 U.S. 577 (1937)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over a tax levied by the incoming state on
chattels purchased in one state but used in the taxing state.
FACTS: Silas (P) was engaged as a contractor or sub in the building of the Grand Coulee
Dam on the Columbia River. P brought into the state of Washington (D) machinery and supplies
worth approximately $900,000. That machinery and supplies were purchased in other states. D
levied upon P a use property tax of $18,423.78 (2% of the cost) and made the demand for
payment. Property purchased within the state was not subject to the use tax; only property
purchased outside the state was subject to that tax but the law had provisions for making
sure that double payment was not extracted. P refused to pay and the District Court of three
judges adjudged the statute void on its face. This appeal resulted.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment