COUGHLIN V. COMMISSIONER
203 F.2d 307 (2nd Cir. 1953)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over deductions regarding professional education.
Coughlin (P), lawyer, challenged a decision of the Tax Court, upholding a disallowance of a
deduction under I.R.C. 23(a)(1)(A) as an ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in
carrying on a trade/business.
FACTS: P was a tax attorney. To keep current in his profession he attended the Fifth
Annual Institute on Federal Taxation which was conducted in New York City by NYU. He
incurred expenses for tuition of $305 which P claimed as an allowable deduction under
section 23(a)(1)(A) as an ordinary and necessary expense in carrying on a trade or business.
The IRS disallowed the deduction. The Tax Court upheld that decision with four judges
dissenting. The court reasoned that it was not deductible because of the educational and
personal nature of the object pursued by the petitioner. P contends that the expenses were
directly connected with or proximately resulted from the practice of his profession. This
appeal resulted.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment