HALPERN V. LACY INVESTMENT CORP.
259 Ga. 264 (1989)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a claim of adverse possession.
FACTS: Lacy (D) owned land which Halpern (P) claimed by adverse possession. After refusal
by D to allow P to purchase the land, P bulldozed it, cleared it and included it in his yard
ever since. The jury found for D and awarded D damages for slander of title and trespass and
for the expenses of litigation. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment