KOSCIELSKI V. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS
435 F.3d 898 (2005)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Koscielski (P) appealed from a summary judgment for City (D) in P's
suit that D's zoning ordinances violated due process and equal protection because P could
not open a gun dealership.
FACTS: P opened a firearms dealership in D. Two months later, D enacted a moratorium
prohibiting firearms dealers from locating, relocating, or expanding within the city. D
unsuccessfully attempted to apply the moratorium retroactively. D then enacted zoning
ordinances requiring firearms dealers to obtain conditional use permits and locate within
particular zones and only in locations sufficiently distant from day care centers and
churches. P's dealership was grandfathered as a nonconforming use and therefore was
permitted to remain even though it was located near both a day care center and a church. P's
lease was canceled and he was unable to obtain a lease in an allowed zone. P then leased a
site in a zone that does not permit firearms retailers. D issued a cease and desist order,
and P filed suit on due process, equal protection, and takings grounds, claiming the zoning
ordinances impermissibly prohibit firearms retailers from locating within the city. The
court granted summary judgment to D and P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment