KURPIEL V. KURPIEL
271 N.Y.S.2d 114 (1966)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an action for partition of real property.
FACTS: P and D were husband and wife and D1, Edward, was D's son. Prior to June 1, 1955,
P was the sale owner of the property involved. On that day, P conveyed a parcel of the land
to Joseph, Jenny and Edward jointly and not as tenants in common. Ds denied that they were
joint tenants. D also alleged that she was awarded possession of the property by an order of
the Family Court and hat P and D were tenants by entirety of an undivided one half interest
and as a tenant by entirety, P cannot maintain his present action for a partition of the
real property.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment