PEOPLE V. PICKERING
276 P.3d 553 (2011)
NATURE OF THE CASE: The People (P) appealed a reversal of a conviction for reckless
manslaughter against Pickering (D).
FACTS: D and his friend, Bates, went to the apartment of another friend, Morgan, where
Morgan and two other men, Villarreal and Torres, were present. An argument ensued between D,
Bates, Morgan, and Villarreal, leading to a fight during which D allegedly stabbed
Villarreal to death. D was charged with second-degree murder. D claimed to have acted in
self-defense. The trial court gave a jury instruction on second-degree murder, which
required P to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that D had knowingly caused Villarreal's death
and that D did not act in self-defense. The trial court gave another instruction on the
lesser-included charge of reckless manslaughter, which required P to prove beyond a
reasonable doubt that D recklessly caused Villarreal's death. The latter instruction made no
mention of self-defense. The jury found D guilty of reckless manslaughter and D appealed to
the court of appeals. The court of appeals reversed. The court of appeals concluded that the
instruction could have led the jury to misunderstand the relationship between recklessness
and self-defense and find D guilty of reckless manslaughter even if it concluded that P
failed to prove that he did not act in self-defense. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment