PIETROWSKI V. DUFRANE
634 N.W.2d 109 (2001)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Dufrane (D) appealed an order granting summary judgment to Pietrowski
(P) in P's action to enforce a restrictive covenant.
FACTS: D purchased a single-family residence with an attached two-and-one-half car
garage. D then procured a building permit for the construction of an additional
440-square-foot building on their property. D began constructing a detached two-and-one-half
car garage on their property and immediately adjacent to P's property. During construction,
P notified D that the garage violated restrictive covenants. P sued D to enforce the
restrictive covenant and to have the garage razed. D countered that P had in fact violated
the same covenant by constructing one single family residence and one garage. D also argued
that numerous other violations of the restrictive covenant demonstrated a change in the
character of the neighborhood, indicating that the restrictive covenant had been abandoned.
Both filed summary judgment motions. The court awarded P the judgment and D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment