UNITED STATES V. BURROWS 36 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 1994) CASE BRIEF

UNITED STATES V. BURROWS

36 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 1994)

NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal from a conviction for drug trafficking crimes.

FACTS: A DEA informant, Bugsy, had consensual telephone monitored conversations with Burrows (D). Bugsy offered to put D in touch with a prospective buyer who wished to purchase five pounds of meth. The buyer was a DEA agent. D went to his source, Rodriguez and got five pounds of meth and went to the exchange and was arrested. Immediately upon his arrest D professed that he was working undercover for the Riverside County Deputy Sheriff, Kenneth Vann, in order to arrest Rodriguez. D then offered to lure Rodriguez to the location with a story that the deal was going to fall apart because the buyers had not brought enough money. Rodriguez arrived with two companions to negotiate. They were arrested. D continued to cooperate with the government, but the government did not believe D's story and prosecuted D with the others. The deputy appeared at trial and disclaimed the fact that D was working for him but did state that he had meet with D and discussed that possibility. The jury was instructed on the defense of public authority. D was convicted and D appealed; he could only make out a defense of public authority if he reasonably believed that he was acting pursuant to police authority.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner