WALKER V. IRETON
559 P.2d 340 (1977)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a suit in specific performance of an oral contract for the
sale of farmland.
FACTS: Walker (P) filed suit for specific performance of an oral contract for the sale of
farmland. Ireton (D) defended on the grounds of the statute of frauds and filed a motion for
summary judgment. P and D discussed the oral sale of D's farm from July 1973 until July
1974. P tried to get D to sign a written contract but D refused as he said he was honest and
one was not needed. The initial check of $50 that was delivered as per the oral agreement
but it was never endorsed or cashed. D even offered $200 to P to cancel their oral contract.
P obtained an abstract of title from Mrs. D. P queried Mrs. D as to why the initial check
had not been cashed. The second installment was tendered for $7,612.50. D then informed P
that he was backing out of the deal and refused the check. P refused to take back his $50
check. P was upset as he had purchased another farm prior to talking to D and because D's
farm was better P sold the prior farm in order to buy D's land. There was no evidence that D
even knew that P had sold his other farm in reliance on the oral contract with D. D's motion
was granted and P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment