WARD V. SLAVECEK
466 S.W. 2d 91 (1971)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over an implied easement.
FACTS: Ward (P) and Slavecek (D) owned adjacent lots and title was derived from a common
predecessor in title who build a driveway centered in the east west division line between
the two lots to serve as an approach to his garage. D's predecessor constructed a garage on
his lot and began to use the original driveway in common with his neighbor and with consent.
In 1970, D then built a fence which divided the driveway that makes P's use of the driveway
and garage worthless; (allegedly). P sued for an implied easement. The trial court denied
that request.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment