BARCUME V. CITY OF FLINT
819 F.Supp. 631 (E.D. Mich 1993)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a motion for summary judgment, on a sex discrimination
lawsuit that was allegedly barred by the statute of limitations.
FACTS: This was a civil rights action filed by 13 female police officers for
discriminatory hiring and promotion practices and a sexually hostile working environment
within the Flint Police Department ('FPD'). There were thirteen separate plaintiffs alleging
the discrimination. The original complaint was filed on January 30, 1984. Almost two years
later, after extensive discovery had already taken place, plaintiffs moved the Court for
leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. A hearing was held on June 23, 1986 and the Court
granted plaintiffs' motion to file an amended complaint, provided that the amended pleading
separated plaintiffs' claims regarding the constitutionality of defendant, City's,
Affirmative Action Plan ('AAP') from those alleging 'traditional' or 'garden variety'
discrimination on the basis of sex. They filed their amended complaint on February 26, 1987.
The City (D) seeks summary judgment to dismiss or limit plaintiffs' claims based on the
statute of limitations.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment