BLONDER-TONGUE LABORATORIES V. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION
402 U.S. 313 (1971)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a patent infringement case and an appeal over the use of
nonmutual defensive collateral estoppel.
FACTS: The rule of law in patent cases was to allow a patentee another suit even if he
lost a first suit to uphold his patent; Triplett v. Lowell 297 U.S. 638 (1936). The lower
courts allowed Foundation (P) to maintain a second action after losing its first. P owned a
patent for a radio and television antenna. Its patent was held invalid in its first suit. P
then sued Blonder (D) for infringement on the same patent. D asserted collateral estoppel.
The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment