DeSHANEY V. WINNEBAGO COUNTY DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES
489 U.S. 189 (1989)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Petitioner sued respondents claiming that their failure to act
deprived him of his liberty in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment to the United States Constitution.
FACTS: DeSheney (P) was born in 1979 and his father was awarded custody when he was
one-year-old. In January 1982, P's stepmother complained to the police that P was being
abused by his father. No action was taken by DSS upon an interview. In January 1983, P was
admitted to a local hospital with multiple bruises and abrasions. DSS was notified and after
a team was assembled, they determined that there was insufficient evidence of abuse to
retain P in the custody of the court. Counseling and enrollment in preschool were
voluntarily agreed to. A month later, P was again being treated for suspicious injuries.
Again, it was concluded that there was no basis for action. During the next six months, the
caseworker visited and noticed suspicious injuries to P's head and that he had not been
enrolled in school. By November 1983, another trip to the emergency room was recorded and
when a home visit was conducted, the worker was told that P was too ill to see her. In March
1984, P was in a coma from a series of hemorrhages from traumatic injuries inflicted over a
long period. P suffered severe brain damage. P sued D under 42 U.S.C. 1983 in that D denied
P due process. Summary judgment was granted to D. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh
Circuit affirmed, holding that petitioners had not made out an actionable 1983 claim for
two alternative reasons. First, the court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment does not require a state or local governmental entity to protect its citizens from
'private violence, or other mishaps not attributable to the conduct of its employees.' The
court held that the causal connection between respondents' conduct and Joshua's injuries was
too attenuated to establish a deprivation of constitutional rights actionable under 1983.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment