GEIER V. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. 529 U.S. 861 (2000) CASE BRIEF

GEIER V. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.

529 U.S. 861 (2000)

NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the 1984 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard and whether a common law action was preempted by the Act. (Read the dissent first paragraph first to understand what this case is about).

FACTS: Standard FMVSS 208 required auto manufacturers to equip some but not all of their 1987 vehicles with passive restraints. In 1992, Geier (P), driving a 1987 Honda, collided with a tree and was seriously injured. The car was equipped with manual shoulder and lap belts, which P had buckled at the time of the accident. The car was not equipped with airbags or other passive restraints. P sued Honda (D) in the District of Columbia. P claimed that D had designed the car negligently because it lacked an air bag. The lawsuit was dismissed. The court noted that FMVSS 208 gave the manufacturers a choice as to whether to install airbags. The court concluded that since P’s lawsuit sought to establish a different safety standard, it was preempted by a provision in the Act that preempts any safety standard that was not identical to the federal standard. The Court of Appeals agreed. But, it had doubts that P’s lawsuit would establish the kind of safety standard to which the Act’s express preemption applied. Nonetheless, it held that P’s tort law claim was an obstacle to the accomplishment of FMVSS’s objectives and that under ordinary preemption principles, the Act preempted the lawsuit.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner