KEIDATZ V. ALBANY
39 Cal.2d 826 (1952)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an action for fraud.
FACTS: P sued D for fraud alleging that D lied to P about certain aspects of a newly
constructed home and the location of the home on the real property. P alleged that the home
was sold for $6,500 but was worth only $3,000. D denied the allegations and plead that the
action was barred by two prior actions. D moved for summary judgment. In the first suit, P
sued for fraud and failure of consideration and failed to amend the complaint and it was
dismissed. P then sued under Section 473 and relief was denied (rescission). No appeal was
taken. P then instituted the present action. D's motion was granted. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment