RED LION BROADCASTING CO. V. FCC 395 U.S. 367 (1969) CASE BRIEF

RED LION BROADCASTING CO. V. FCC

395 U.S. 367 (1969)

NATURE OF THE CASE: These two cases challenge the constitutional and statutory bases of the fairness doctrine and component rules promulgated by the FCC. Red Lion involves the application of the fairness doctrine to a particular broadcast, and RTNDA involves a review the FCC's 1967 promulgation of the personal attack and political editorializing regulations, which were laid down after the Red Lion litigation had begun.

FACTS: In a Red Lion Broadcasting Company (P) radio program, Reverend Billy James Hargis made comments about Fred. J. Cook, an author who had written a book about Senator Barry Goldwater. Hargis alleged that Cook had once been fired by a newspaper for making up charges against city officials, and had later worked for a publication with Communist affiliations. Cook asked P for free air time to reply to these allegations, but P denied him. However, the Federal Communications Commission (D) found that the Hargis broadcast was a personal attack on Cook, and forced P to give Cook free air time. The lower federal courts upheld D's decision, and P appealed to the Supreme Court. While this litigation was going on, D adopted regulations requiring broadcasters to make free airtime available following personal attacks, political endorsements, editorials, etc. RTNDA (P) complained, and a court of appeals declared these regulations unconstitutional. D appealed to the Supreme Court, which joined the two Ps to consider whether or not the regulations and actions of D violated the 1st amendment.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner