EXXON SHIPPING CO. v. BAKER
544 U.S.471 (2008)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over punitive damages under maritime law.
FACTS: The supertanker Exxon Valdez grounded on the Alaskan coast spilling millions of
gallons of crude oil into Prince William Sound. The owner, Exxon Shipping Co. (D), and its
owner, petitioner Exxon Mobil Corp. (D), have settled state and federal claims for
environmental damage, with payments exceeding $1 billion. This action by Baker (P) and
others, including commercial fishermen and native Alaskans, was brought for economic losses
to individuals dependent on Prince William Sound for their livelihoods. The tanker's captain
was Joseph Hazelwood, who had completed a 28-day alcohol treatment program while employed by
D, as his superiors knew, but dropped out of a prescribed follow-up program and stopped
going to Alcoholics Anonymous meetings. There was strong evidence that D was an alcoholic
and was not on the wagon. During the nonstandard departure from the port, Hazelwood left the
bridge and went down to his cabin in order, he said, to do paperwork. This decision was
inexplicable. Captains simply do not quit the bridge during maneuvers out of port, and no
paperwork could have justified it. The evidence was that Hazelwood's presence was required,
both because there should have been two officers on the bridge at all times and his
departure left only one, and because he was the only person on the entire ship licensed to
navigate this part of Prince William Sound. Hazelwood put the tanker on autopilot, speeding
it up, making a required turn trickier, and any mistake harder to correct. A third mate
unlicensed to navigate in those waters, was left alone with the helmsman, a nonofficer. For
reasons that remain a mystery, they failed to make the turn at Busby Light, and a later
emergency maneuver attempted came too late. The tanker ran aground on Bligh Reef, tearing
the hull open and spilling 11 million gallons of crude oil into Prince William Sound.
Hazelwood's blood-alcohol was .061 eleven hours after the spill. Experts testified that to
have this much alcohol in his bloodstream so long after the accident, Hazelwood at the time
of the spill must have had a blood-alcohol level of around .241. That is three times the
legal limit for driving in most States. D spent $2.1 billion in cleanup efforts. D was
charged and plead guilty to a number of crimes. A civil action by the United States and the
State of Alaska for environmental harms ended with a consent decree for Exxon to pay at
least $900 million toward restoring natural resources, and it paid another $303 million in
voluntary settlements with fishermen, property owners, and other private parties. The
remaining civil cases were consolidated into this one. D stipulated to its negligence in the
Valdez disaster and its ensuing liability for compensatory damages. In its charge punitive
damages, emphasizing that they were designed not to provide compensatory relief but to
punish and deter the defendants, the court charged the jury to consider the reprehensibility
of Ds' conduct, their financial condition, the magnitude of the harm, and any mitigating
facts. The jury awarded $5,000 in punitive damages against Hazelwood and $5 billion against
Exxon. The Ninth Circuit remanded twice for adjustments in light of this Court's due process
cases before ultimately itself remitting the award to $2.5 billion. The Supreme Court
granted certiorari to consider whether maritime law allows corporate liability for punitive
damages on the basis of the acts of managerial agents, whether the Clean Water Act (CWA), 86
Stat. 816, 33 U. S. C. 1251 et seq. (2000 ed. and Supp. V), forecloses the award of
punitive damages in maritime spill cases, and whether the punitive damages awarded against
Exxon in this case were excessive as a matter of maritime common law.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment