FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY V. ROOMMATE.COM LLC
666 F.3d 1216 (9th Cir. 2012)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Fair (P) sued Roommate (D) over an alleged violation of the FHA. P
got a summary judgment and D appealed.
FACTS: D operates an internet-based business that helps roommates find each other. When
users sign up, they must create a profile by answering a series of questions about their
sex, sexual orientation and whether children will be living with them. An open-ended
'Additional Comments' section lets users include information not prompted by the
questionnaire. Users are asked to list their preferences for roommate characteristics,
including sex, sexual orientation and familial status. Based on the profiles and
preferences, D matches users and provides them a list of housing-seekers or available rooms
meeting their criteria. Users can also search available listings based on roommate
characteristics, including sex, sexual orientation and familial status. P sued D alleging
that the website's questions requiring disclosure of sex, sexual orientation and familial
status, and its sorting, steering and matching of users based on those characteristics,
violate the FHA. Eventually, the district court held that D's prompting of discriminatory
preferences from users, matching users based on that information and publishing these
preferences violated the FHA and enjoined D from those activities. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment