HART V. STEELE PRODUCTS, INC.
666 N.E.2d 1270 (1996)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This action arose out of the sale of the assets of a steel
manufacturing business.
FACTS: Hart (P) decided to change careers from being a veterinarian by trade. P received
information regarding Steel Products, Inc. (D). P made an offer to purchase the assets of D
contingent on his satisfactory review of the financial statements and books of the company.
Scales was the sole shareholder. Rochon, the general manager, provided balance sheets,
income statements, and federal income tax returns for the years 1987, 1988, and 1989. 1990
financial statements and income tax return showed ordinary income for 1990 of $176,301.94. P
was not given a copy of the 1990 federal tax return. P made another offer to purchase the
assets of D. This offer was accepted and the deal was closed on May 1, 1991. In April of
1993, P contacted Henderson to retrieve some information from the 1990 federal income tax
return. Henderson asked if he wanted information from the original return or the amended
return. Upon learning of the amended return, Paul went to Scales' house and obtained a copy
of it. The amended return showed that for 1990, Steel Products had a loss of $4,344.76. P
filed suit alleging that Ds committed fraud by representing that Steel Products had 1990
ordinary income of $176,301.94 when they knew it has sustained a loss in 1990 of $4,344.76.
P sought reformation of the contract to reflect a reduced purchase price, and also sought an
award of punitive damages. A judgment of $215,114.56 was entered in favor of P and against
Scales; the contract for the sale of D's assets was ordered rescinded. This appeal resulted.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment