HASKELL V. SIEGMUND
170 N.E.2d 393 (1960)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal from a personal injury action.
FACTS: Haskell (P) recovered a judgment against a Seigmund for an auto accident. P then
sought recovery under Peterson's auto liability policy as Siegmund was driving Peterson's
car. Peterson died before the trial of the garnishment action. Siegmund was convicted of
forgery and incarcerated. Neither was available for trial. After the accident, a private
investigator obtained a statement from Peterson that he had loaned Seigmund the car. During
trial, this written statement was admitted into evidence. The insurance company lost and
then appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment