HUTTON V. GLIKSBERG
128 Cal.App.3d 240 (1982)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Gliksberg (D) appealed a court order granting Hutton (P) specific
performance of a contract for the purchase and sale of real property.
FACTS: P and D executed a written contract for the purchase and sale of an apartment
building. They executed escrow instructions dated March 7 which called for escrow to close
on or before April 21, 1977, time being of the essence. As of April 21, P had performed
their obligations but D had not provided escrow with the necessary documents. On April 22,
D, in writing, canceled the escrow. This action followed. The trial court granted a judgment
in favor of P, compelling D to convey the property and awarding incidental compensation. D
appealed. D contends that a net price provision and the terms of the loans were too
uncertain to permit specific enforcement.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment