MITCHELL V. UNITED STATES
526 U.S. 314 (1999)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a question of Fifth Amendment privileges.
FACTS: Mitchell (D) and 22 other defendants were indicted for conspiracy to distribute
cocaine. D was charged with one count of conspiring to distribute five or more kilograms of
cocaine and with three counts of distribution of cocaine within 1000 feet of a school or
playground. D plead guilty to all four counts. D reserved the right to contest the drug
quantity attributable to her under the conspiracy count and the District Court determined
that the drug quantity would be determined at her sentencing hearing. Under Rule 11 the
Court made inquiries informing D of her offenses and possible punishments with the range of
punishment being dictated by the quantities involved and the fact that the government had
not proven any quantities against D at that point in time. D was also told that by pleading
guilty that she had waived various rights including her Fifth Amendment right. During her
sentencing phase evidence was taken regarding the quantities of drug sold by D. D put on no
evidence not did she rebut the evidence presented by the Government. Her counsel argued that
three documented sales of two ounces was the only evidence of sufficient reliability to be
attributed against D for sentencing purposes. The trial court found against D and gave her a
10-year sentence. The judge also informed D that he held it against D that she did not come
forward and testify. The court of appeals affirmed and affirmed that D had waived Fifth
Amendment rights by pleading guilty. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment