NEW JERSEY V. T.L.O.
469 U.S. 325 (1985)
NATURE OF THE CASE: T.L.O. (D) was caught smoking in a school lavatory. D denied she had
been smoking and the Vice Principal demanded to see her purse. A pack of cigarettes was
found along with rolling, papers, marihuana, plastic bags, a substantial amount of cash and
a list of students who owed her money as well as letters that implicated her in marihuana
dealing. The Juvenile Court denied D's motion to suppress the evidence. D was found to be
delinquent. The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court affirmed. The New Jersey
Supreme Court reversed and ordered the suppression of the evidence. The Supreme Court
granted certiorari.
FACTS: A teacher discovered two girls smoking in a lavatory. D, who at that time was a
14-year-old high school freshman was one of the girls. They were taken to the Assistant Vice
Principal. D's companion admitted that she had violated the rule. D denied that she had been
smoking in the lavatory and claimed that she did not smoke at all. The principal demanded to
see her purse. Opening the purse, he found a pack of cigarettes. As he reached into the
purse he also noticed a package of cigarette rolling papers. He immediately suspected the
use of marihuana. He searched the purse thoroughly. He found a small amount of marihuana, a
pipe, a number of empty plastic bags, a substantial quantity of money in one-dollar bills,
an index card that appeared to be a list of students who owed D money, and two letters that
implicated D in marihuana dealing. D's mother and the police were notified. D's mother took
her daughter to police headquarters, where D confessed that she had been selling marihuana
at the high school. On delinquency charges D moved to suppress the evidence found in her
purse as well as her confession, which, she argued, was tainted by the allegedly unlawful
search. The Juvenile Court denied the motion to suppress. It held that a school official may
properly conduct a search of a student's person if the official has a reasonable suspicion
that a crime has been or is in the process of being committed, or reasonable cause to
believe that the search is necessary to maintain school discipline or enforce school
policies. D was found to be a delinquent and sentenced to a year's probation. A divided
Appellate Division affirmed the trial court's finding that there had been no Fourth
Amendment violation, but vacated the adjudication of delinquency and remanded for a
determination whether D had knowingly and voluntarily waived her Fifth Amendment rights
before confessing. D appealed the Fourth Amendment ruling, and the Supreme Court of New
Jersey reversed the judgment of the Appellate Division and ordered the suppression of the
evidence found in D's purse. The State of New Jersey's (P) petition for certiorari was
granted.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment