REYNOLDS V. BAGWELL
198 P.2d 215 (1948)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Defendant (D) appealed from a judgment in favor of Plaintiff (P) in
his action in replevin.
FACTS: P instituted an action in replevin against D for the recovery of a violin, violin
bow, and violin case. P alleged that the property was stolen in January, 1933, and that in
March, 1938, P discovered it in the possession of D and made demand therefor which was
refused. P alleged that D's possession, acquired immediately after the theft, was not open,
notorious and in good faith, and that D sought to conceal the identity of the violin by
willful alteration of its appearance. D alleged that he purchased the property in good faith
and for value, that same had been in his possession without concealment for more than five
years, and pleaded the statute of limitation as a bar to P's action. The jury verdict went
to P and D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment