SIMMONS V. SIMMONS
514 A.2d 128 (1986)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Edward Simmons (H) appealed a refusal to have a judgment marked
satisfied.
FACTS: W acquired against H a judgment for $3024.60 representing child support
arrearages. W obtained the issuance of a writ of execution which directed the sheriff to
seize certain items of H's personal property. Property was seized and sold. The proceeds did
not satisfy the judgment. After the sheriff's sale, a camper and Bronco II were taken by a
credit company in payment of the balance of the purchase money loans made to H. Due to the
sheriff's sale of the camper and Bronco II, H requested that W have the judgment against him
marked satisfied. W refused to do so. The Court decided that since W did not realize any
gain from her purchase of the camper and Bronco II, H was not entitled to have the judgment
against him marked satisfied. H appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment