UNITED STATES V. HENRY
447 U.S. 264 (1980).
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal from a bank robbery conviction.
FACTS: Henry (D) was arrested and indicted for armed bank robbery. An FBI agent
approached Nichols, a cellmate of D's, and told him to be alert to any statements made by D,
but not to initiate any conversation with him, or to question him concerning the robbery.
Nichols reported that D told him about the robbery. Nichols was paid for the information. D
was convicted based on Nichol's testimony. D appealed; his right to counsel was violated.
The court of appeals reversed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment